soybean-field

Argentina: Tango & Rock ’n Roll

 

By Nicolás Barros

In the next few years the international economic and political situation will continue to benefit Argentina. However, there has been no new investment in productive infrastructure in the country. The country’s largest businesses understand the current situation. It favors them, and – aside from some minor criticism – they strongly support the Kirshner (CFK) government. The working class along with other oppressed sectors of the masses have staged a number of struggles and raised their demands. However, this has not resulted in a substantial political challenge to the government and regime mostly because within the working class there is no structure and leadership willing to confront them. There are alarming signs surrounding the actions of the sinister Peronist union bureaucracy (essentially the Hugo Moyano led CGT), the Armed Forces, the police and security forces, which remain violent, ruthless and powerful mafia like organizations.

The international economy continues to favor Argentina. The worldwide destruction of the environment has resulted in the depletion of resources such as raw materials, potable drinking water, arable land, fossil fuels, in atmospheric pollution, desertification, pollution from untreated sewage flowing into open waters, etc. In contrast to this worldwide situation, Argentina has a great advantage in terms of abundant unused natural resources.

First, food production in Argentina is a major asset. The country has a population of only 40 million and its resources could feed up to 560 million.

Secondly, there is a large reserve of skilled labor, another capacity accumulated at a relatively low cost. This is still the case despite the decrease of skilled labor that characterized Argentina after the 1970’s and the decades of general impoverishment that followed.

Thirdly, the balance of imports and exports is under control. Since 2001 the foreign debt has grown vegetatively. In order to normalize relations in the financial markets, the Kirchner administration negotiated an exchange of foreign debt for state issued bonds, which managed to extend the timeline of payments. In the process: unpaid interest was capitalized, and capital was reduced. Interest rates, contractual obligations, type of currency for payments and the mass of debt remained about the same. The end result is a debt that, provided there is a growing economy and no new indebtedness, can be paid. It won’t be a legitimate or beneficial debt, just a debt that is payable within its current terms.

It is important to mention that in recent months several provinces in Argentina, among them Buenos Aires, Neuquén, Cordoba, Rio Negro, Chubut and the city of Buenos Aires, have each received loans in amounts of between 85 and 450 million US dollars, with interest rates between 9.75% and 15.25%, which will be applied to current expenses. Although these are still low figures, the tendency is disturbing.

The only source of foreign income for the country is its trade surplus. The Kirchner administration uses these resources for:

a. The maintenance of a fund to protect itself against foreign exchange risks. Foreign exchange reserves are close to 60 billion US dollars, and are used in part to stabilize the value of the peso, the domestic currency, assuring a supply of enough resources in case of a surge in the demand for dollars. This is the policy advocated for decades by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), even more so after the collapse of Iceland, Greece, Ireland and Portugal.

b. The repayment of the foreign debt and payments of capital and interest on public foreign debt.

c. The remission of royalties, utilities, the flight of capital and payments for the license over trade names or products registered with foreign owners; repatriation of utilities (earnings after taxes) obtained by subsidiaries of transnational corporations; and payment of dividends to actionists outside of the country.

Many corporations are subsidiaries that send payments to their parent company abroad for credits they received, however many of these or similar transactions are fraudulent maneuvers used to send money out of the country.

d. Subsidizing national and international businesses and other economic sectors. The state provides subventions to a variety of entities, from private corporations like General Motors or FIAT, to entire economic sectors like oil, energy and transportation. A fourth aspect of the Argentinean economy is actually its weakest: the lack of productive investment. Although scarce investment in capital goods is a global phenomenon (except for Brazil, Russia, India and China), that does not make it any less harmful for several reasons:

1) The over utilization of existing capacity produces inflation. When existing factories, in the absence of expansion projects or adequate maintenance, are working at the limit of their capacity, the entrepreneurs react to their own decision not to increase investment and production with price increases.

 2) The trade surplus based on the production of finished commodities has deepened economic dependence by requiring higher imports of intermediate goods (materials that become part of another product) to sustain consumption. Some agricultural necessities are imported. For example in the automotive industry, 60% of parts used on the assembly line are imported. In the auto parts industry many of the components also come from abroad. This is repeated to a greater or lesser degree in electronics, chemicals, agricultural machinery, appliances, medicines and so on.

3) The maintenance cost also increases with the gradual obsolescence of capital goods, plant facilities, machinery, etc.

4) The difference obtained by the growth of sectoral productivity of exportable items does not return as physical capital goods.

5) Social training of workers is degraded as successive generations abandon formal education and, most importantly, are not engaged in formal, permanent employment at a young age. In this way they lose contact with changing work methods and practices that qualify the workers and influence their culture.

6) It results in environmental deterioration

7) It increases stress on the resources of the extractive industry, both renewable and non-renewable. It results in the disappearance of thousands of plant and animal species and forests as a sub product of the activity of industries like mining, petroleum, chemical, agriculture and forestry. It causes pollution of the coasts and watercourses, increases the emission of greenhouse gases due to intensive farming and the amount of monocultures production. Tragically, indigenous peoples are murdered by the destruction of the ecosystems that sustain them.

Despite the lack of investment, the economic situation is still relatively beneficial and, together with the social stability reached by the policies of the Kirchners, are the main reasons why the government has such strong support from the bourgeoisie. Even the arbitrary actions related to trade issues by Guillermo Moreno*, Interior Commerce Minister, or the reactions of Hugo Moyano**, leader of the CGT, howling against judicial problems of his own making, or the suggestions of price control, or the relationship with Hugo Chávez, do not become major issues and do not diminish the main contention point: business profits have been maintained and have even increased year after year. Even in the critical years of 2008 and 2009 the Argentinean bourgeoisie clearly maintained their profits.

In general the working class also has a favorable disposition towards the current government. It is true that opinions differ from sector to sector, but the most favorable opinions are found among the most exploited. The urban petite bourgeoisie is fragmented between those who are fiercely anti-Kirchner and others who have more recently come to support the government. The reason for this is tangible: unemployment remains stable, neither increasing nor decreasing, and underemployment shows only a vegetative growth. (Watch out if it grows like zucchini though!) While inflation is an important adverse factor, the cycle of negotiations of collective bargaining agreements and wage increases helps to keep the calm, particularly among the privileged sectors of the organized labor movement, those who have salaries above $5000 Argentinean pesos. For them, the main demands are tax brackets set to avoid their payment of income tax and to continue their access to good consumer credit.

From the perspective of other parts of the working class and the oppressed masses, the situation is more complex. There have been a number of important union struggles, such as those involving food processors (Kraft), oil workers, teachers, railroad and subway workers, state employees in Cordoba, together with struggles for land and housing, and protests against police brutality, etc. but none of these struggles has been able to advance beyond an elementary level. There is not a single force, more or less organized, within the working class movement (mainly industrial) that is capable of channeling sectoral demands into a broader political struggle to challenge the regime. Despite all this, these recent struggles and their results have enriched the experience of the workers, paving the way for a renewed and more militant struggle in 2011.

The most striking social consequences of the existing inequality are to be found in the conditions of extreme poverty suffered by the original ethnic population, aliens in their own land, vastly reduced in numbers, their habitats, and subsistence sustaining ecosystems stolen, and prominent only as the basis for the statistics reporting rates of death due to malnourishment.

The small towns of the interior have been reduced to ghostly railway stations and just too many old good memories. Future archaeological excavations of these places would reveal geological layer after layer of accumulated misery. They reveal the oppression of the indigenous Araucanians/Mapuches, Wichis, Tufas, of the ethnic populations of the Bolivians, Paraguayans, Peruvians, etc. and also the special oppression of women whose work is inadequately compensated and whose needs are greater, all of which is nailed to a crucifix that Argentineans pay for with their taxes.

Although Kirchnerism appears to be strong, it represents only the progressive leg of the three-legged governing coalition formed with the reactionary Peronist union bureaucracy, the same characters who once were, literally, executioners of progressive forces, and with elected Peronist officials, including the cuasi-mafioso Mayors of greater Buenos Aires and the semi-feudal governors of the interior provinces. The unprincipled arrangement cementing this government has proven to be very useful (but not without contradictions) in the process leading to a gradual return to a state of a more or less peaceful normalcy after the social revolt of 2001. To this effect the government counted on the full support of all the right wing political currents in the opposition, including the ancient Union Civica Radical; the so-called Federal Peronism; PRO, the party of Mauricio Macri, Mayor of Buenos Aires; the Civic Coalition, etc. All these forces attempted to organize an alternative to Kirchnerism, but never achieved their goal.

Another defining aspect of Argentina is its position as a country dependent on imperialism, which the current government has been unable to change. This can be illustrated by the participation of Argentina in the military forces invading Haiti. Argentina has collaborated as a supporting player in the invasion and genocide of the Haitian people under the military leadership of the USA, France and Brazil. We also have to point to the complete alignment of the government with the emerging Brazilian empire, which already, through its businesses, controls two thirds of the Argentinean economy.

We see two warning signals for Argentina in the immediate future: first the Peronist union bureaucracy and secondly the state security apparatus and its mirror in the armed forces. In the first case it is not only about the CGT as the key institution that helped the government to sail through a smooth transition, but about the leadership at the helm today – the set of unions in the CGT led by Hugo Moyano- that portray themselves as the political and ideological heirs of Peron’s legacy: my only heir is the people.

The Moyano-led unions have candidates for deputy governor, mayors, representatives, senators, councilmen and officials in the three branches of government and are establishing a new national structure called the Peronist National Trade Union Current (Corriente Nacional Sindical Peronista or CNSP).

The other warning signal is coming from the police, security and armed forces. They have gradually permeated all layers of society. They organize crime and drug trafficking, something particularly dangerous in poor neighborhoods and marginalized sectors of society. They also get involved in the coordination of private security, the “patovicas” (night club guards), or with “barras bravas” (hooligans around soccer teams) or other similar layers of repressive bodies and get involved in running of illegal gambling, prostitution rings, etc. This is a caste-like layer of society that constantly generates semiautonomous sectors seeking new businesses. It is also a tool of social control and a source of political pressure to be afraid of.

The country will most likely move in the direction of greater struggles and conflicts. Sooner or later the situation in other parts of the world will reach Argentina, the pending contradictions within the regime will explode into the open and rumblings will again be heard in the streets.

The electoral season this year could turn into a catalyst to amplify the struggles. It could offer a political opportunity for large sectors of the masses to express their disgust with the promises of the current pseudo progressive government and its sinister right-wing opposition. For this to happen, it would be necessary to build an electoral front between the left, which still remains a marginal force, and a very weak center left This would be a highly visible response to the need for political representation of important and advanced sectors of the working class and oppressed masses.

On the agenda for the near future, we see the need for building of mass rank-and-file union organizations combined with a sustained political struggle against the union bureaucracy. The fight to weaken and dismantle the omnipresent police and security forces will also be high on the list. Add to this the struggle to stop the attacks against indigenous peoples and the destruction of the environment, not to mention the long overdue battles of the agrarian revolution. All of these issues will be resolved as part of the historic struggle for a socialist transformation of Argentina and world society.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>